Metacarpal fractures are common upper extremity injuries. The hand has a complex anatomy, with vital structures such as nerves, blood vessels, and tendons surrounding the metacarpals. Inadequate reduction or improper fixation of metacarpal fractures can significantly impair hand function and appearance. The basic principles of metacarpal fracture treatment are: anatomical or near‑anatomical reduction; minimal surgical trauma; sufficient fracture stabilization to ensure healing and early functional rehabilitation; and postoperative elevation to reduce oedema.
Treatment options for metacarpal fractures are diverse, including closed reduction and external immobilization, closed reduction and percutaneous K‑wire fixation, intramedullary pinning, mini‑external fixator application, elastic traction fixation, and open reduction and internal fixation. The choice of treatment depends on multiple factors: patient‑related factors—such as age, comorbidities, financial status, compliance, and motivation; fracture‑related factors—such as location, type, displacement, stability, and soft‑tissue injury; and treatment‑related factors—including the surgeon's experience with the fracture, timing of intervention, soft‑tissue management, reduction technique, surgical approach, and implant selection.
Percutaneous pinning is an important treatment modality for hand fractures. Commonly used pinning techniques include Kirschner wires, percutaneous intramedullary pins, percutaneous elastic traction, and mini‑external fixators. The advantages of percutaneous pinning are:
1. Simple technique and highly versatile application.
2. Minimal soft‑tissue dissection, less disruption to fracture‑site blood supply, and reduced surgical trauma, all of which promote fracture healing.
3. Wide applicability—suitable for most hand fractures. After healing, K‑wires and screws can be removed in the outpatient setting, saving hospital stay time and medical costs.
4. Resistance to axial stress at the fracture site prevents shortening and rotation, enhances stability, and allows early joint mobilization, leading to satisfactory recovery of hand function.
Case Presentation
A 21‑year‑old male presented with fractures of the third and fourth metacarpals after an accident. The patient refused open reduction and plate fixation and requested closed percutaneous pinning.


Brachial plexus block
C‑arm workstation
Skin marking

Two proximal blind pins inserted
Manual reduction performed
Third blind pin inserted
Fluoroscopy revealed unacceptable dorsal angulation deformity of the fourth metacarpal

K‑wire leverage technique employed
"Poking, leveraging, and pushing"
Successful reduction achieved

Fourth K‑wire inserted blindly

AP, oblique, and lateral fluoroscopic views
Satisfactory fracture reduction
Adequate implant positioning



The essence of reduction: percutaneous "poking"

Postoperative appearance